| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
1. CCP PLEASE FIX VARGUR - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
lol @ you whiners. Come on sisi and see what some of the slightly experienced vargur pilots can do! In the right hands they ARE a solo pwnmobile. The Golem IMHO is the only OP marauder. It's easier to kill carriers than a well tanked Golem :( T...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2007.12.24 08:49:00
|
2. Amarr Recon - Current state - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Poco Curante At what point does any Amarr ship ever become a compelling fleet member. Never. huh? Abaddon is best fleet ship imho, Geddon average but still okay. Curse used to make for awesome support fleet.
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2007.11.03 08:59:00
|
3. Paladin change on SiSi - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Qui Shon Originally by: eLLioTT wave - Tiny locking range ( but counter this by totally nurfing the Serpentis maximum damp) This will make them fairly close range in keeping with the weapons they're designed to use...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2007.11.02 16:45:00
|
4. Paladin change on SiSi - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I'll believe it when it's on TQ :P But seriously CCP, this is not a T1 battleship. You say these ships are for PvE but Amarr will always suck vs anything but sansha's. If you really want to make it a PvE ship then it will have to be khanid Mk2 t...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2007.11.02 15:47:00
|
5. Amarr Recon - Current state - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Dev's please change your "no posting in Amarr threads" policy! We know you're reading, but this policy is stupid. Hydro and the other contributors have put a lot of thought into this, at least acknowledge their efforts and that there is a problem...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2007.11.02 15:24:00
|
6. zealot! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Fly sac or harbinger. Zealot is broken currently, it's t1 younger sibling (omen) does more dps :( The sad part is, Zealot is supposed to be Amarr's damage hac while sac is supposed to be the tanking one... but the sac out tanks and out damages th...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2007.11.02 03:27:00
|
7. Apoc or Geddon for missions - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Mechalus Kal'lith Originally by: Mastin Dragonfly Edited by: Mastin Dragonfly on 26/04/2007 11:06:51 Originally by: Mechalus Kal'lith Say I do go for the Raven to be able to do lvl4's. Whats the minimum o...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2007.04.26 15:28:00
|
8. Apoc or Geddon for missions - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
As others have said you can do it in Apoc (geddon is really hard for a lot of them) Abaddon i haven't tried for pve but from pvp experience it will never have the cap for solo missions. Coming from where you are now - I advise you give up and get...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2007.04.26 02:13:00
|
9. [Soon] Apocalypse Overhaul - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
i'd prefer apoc slot layout left alone and change its bonuses to give it a double armor. 5% resists and 7.5% repair amount per level. (yes steal it from the Gallente who should never have gotten it anyway) If amarr really can tank better than any...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.30 09:54:00
|
10. Shield Tanking vs. Armor Tanking - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: DrEiak That is confusing go here instead: Ballance and Roles Lol next you should advirtise on the eve billboards <<
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.30 09:35:00
|
11. The Amarr T3 BS is going to be... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Thud I like the abaddon like it is now. With its 8/4/8 set up i can fit it like my pulse geddon + an eccm . Great,i almost trained for an domi or tempest to get a decent solo BS fitting +ECCM,now i can stick to amarr bs. A...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.30 09:33:00
|
12. Amarr - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: DrEiak IF YOU POST HERE READ THIS! The Doc has a point
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.30 09:31:00
|
13. The Amarr T3 BS is going to be... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: hylleX Originally by: eLLioTT wave We have apoc with 8 turrets already, giving us another is a serious lack of creativity on CCP's part. I too like the arbitrator progression to BS idea. I would like to see: 6/6/6 -...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.30 05:48:00
|
14. The Amarr T3 BS is going to be... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
We have apoc with 8 turrets already, giving us another is a serious lack of creativity on CCP's part. I too like the arbitrator progression to BS idea. I would like to see: 6/6/6 - 2 turrets 4 launchers (think curse/damnation) 5% bonus to Tracki...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.30 03:53:00
|
15. A proposal for a warp and propulsion strength revamp - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Creative thinking, however i think it is already hard enough to catch people with WCS as they are now. I think wait and see what the WCS / insta changes bring then re consider an idea like this one.
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.18 09:53:00
|
16. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Tuxford ... WCS This has been talked about for as long as I can remember. I'm not sure there has been any official stand on this from CCP although as I recall TomB has mentioned that he didn't like them. The problem is th...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.18 09:44:00
|
17. Ultimate tankers? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: eLLioTT wave on 17/08/2006 08:02:45 Well this is the easiest one ever: 1. ultimate shield tanker = Leviathan 2. ultimate armor tanker = Avatar 3. ultimate overall multitanker = Leviathan with crystal set 4 = Leviathan 5 = avatar 6 ...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.17 08:02:00
|
18. Why ECM is overpowered. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Sn4k3 3y3s Originally by: Nebuli If CCP cant come up with a way to fix I dont know why they dont just put it back how it was. Epeen, makes them look like they failed. More evidence that BoB are CCP alts! Wha...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.17 03:26:00
|
19. I fly a battleship and I want you to QUOTE ME HAPPY! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Insurance i think will be possible with the new contracts system. Perhaps CCP might change the default insurance to be really dodgy, to encourage player run insurance firms to rise up. These could include things like "reckless pilot" ratings that ...
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.17 03:19:00
|
20. Battleships in siege mode - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron It would make the currently overpowered Dominix even more powerful please read thread this has already been disproved
- by eLLioTT wave - at 2006.08.16 05:13:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |